The following are 10 of the most illustrative of the principles and doctrines governing judicial foreclosure of real estate mortgages. These landmark cases provide extensive discussions on Rule 68 and the pertinent provisions of the Civil Code.[1] PNB vs. Sanao Marketing Corporation, G.R. No. 153951, July 29, 2005;[2] Sps. Arquiza vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 160479, June 8, 2005;
[3] United Overseas Bank Phils. (formerly Westmont Bank) vs. Rosemoor Mining & Development Corp., G.R. Nos. 159669 & 163521, March 12, 2007;
[4] Monzon vs. Relova, G.R. No. 171827, September 17, 2008;
[5]Chieng vs. Spouses Santos, G.R. No. 169647, August 31, 2007;
[6] Suico Rattan & Buri Interiors, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 138145, June 15, 2006;
[7] Selegna Management and Development Corporation vs. UCPB, G.R. No. 165662, May 31, 2006;
[8] Benguet Management Corp. vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 153571, Sept. 16, 2003;
[9] Villanueva vs. Cherdan Lending Investors Corporation, G.R. No. 177881, October 13, 2010;
[10] Dayot vs. Shell Chemical Company, (Phils.), Inc., G.R. No. 156542, June 26, 2007.