Case Digest: Samahang Manggagawa sa Charter Chemical v. Charter Chemical and Coating

G.R. No. 169717: March 16, 2011.

SAMAHANG MANGGAGAWA SA CHARTER CHEMICAL SOLIDARITY OF UNIONS IN THE PHILIPPINES FOR EMPOWERMENT AND REFORMS [SMCC-SUPER], ZACARRIAS JERRY VICTORIO - UNION PRESIDENT, Petitioner, v. CHARTER CHEMICAL AND COATING CORPORATION, Respondent.

DEL CASTILLO, J.:


FACTS:

On February 19, 1999,Samahang Manggagawasa Charter Chemical Solidarity of Unions in the Philippines for Empowerment and Reforms (petitioner union) filed a petition for certification election among the regular rank-and-file employees of Charter Chemical and Coating Corporation (respondent company) with the Mediation Arbitration Unit of the DOLE, National Capital Region. On April 14, 1999, respondent company filed an Answer with Motion to Dismiss on the ground that petitioner union is not a legitimate labor organization because of (1) failure to comply with the documentation requirements set by law, and (2) the inclusion of supervisory employees within petitioner union.

The Med-Arbiter agreed with the respondent company. Though the DOLE disagreed with the Med-Arbiter on its findings regarding the documentation requirements and the inclusion of supervisory employees in the union, it ruled that the petitioner union did not file its petition on time. Another union, supposedly, had filed a petition for certification election and its petition has been decided with finality. The CA upheld the findings of the Med-Arbiter.

ISSUES:

1. Whether or not the unions charter certificate needed to be certified under oath

2. Whether or not the mingling of supervisory employees with rank and file employees nullifies the legal personality of the union


HELD:

The petition is granted.

LABOR LAW: Legal personality of a union, when nullified.


First issue: Section 1, Rule VI of the Implementing Rules of Book V, as amended by D.O. No. 9, series of 1997 does require that a charter certificate be under oath. However, in San Miguel Corporation (Mandaue Packaging Products Plants) v. Mandaue Packing Products Plants-San Miguel Corporation Monthlies Rank-and-File Union-FFW (MPPP-SMPP-SMAMRFU-FFW), which was decided under the auspices of D.O. No. 9, Series of 1997, we ruled that it was not necessary for the charter certificate to be certified and attested by the local/chapter officers, since it does not make sense to have the local/chapters officers certify or attest to a document which they had no hand in the preparation of. In accordance with this ruling, petitioner unions charter certificate need not be executed under oath. Consequently, it validly acquired the status of a legitimate labor organization upon submission of (1) its charter certificate, (2) the names of its officers, their addresses, and its principal office, and (3) its constitution and by-laws the last two requirements having been executed under oath by the proper union officials as borne out by the records.

Second issue: In Tagaytay Highlands Int'l. Golf Club, Inc. v. Tagaytay Highlands Employees Union-PGTWO in which the core issue was whether mingling affects the legitimacy of a labor organization and its right to file a petition for certification election, the Court, given the altered milieu, abandoned the view inToyotaandDunlopand reverted to its pronouncement in Lopez that while there is a prohibition against the mingling of supervisory and rank-and-file employees in one labor organization, the Labor Code does not provide for the effects thereof. Thus, the Court held that after a labor organization has been registered, it may exercise all the rights and privileges of a legitimate labor organization. Any mingling between supervisory and rank-and-file employees in its membership cannot affect its legitimacy for that is not among the grounds for cancellation of its registration, unless such mingling was brought about by misrepresentation, false statement or fraud under Article 239 of the Labor Code. As a result, petitioner union was not divested of its status as a legitimate labor organization even if some of its members were supervisory employees; it had the right to file the subject petition for certification election.

GRANTED.