Free Mock Bar Question #2

[1] Send your answer to;
[2] Keep your answer within four paragraphs only;
[3] Answer with relevant law, good language (English) and lawyer-like logic;
[4] Wait for our response. IMPORTANT NOTE: This is a free mock bar practice online; we may not be able to respond to you very quickly but you will definitely receive a response. Books and sessions in reputable review schools cannot be replaced;
[5] Our response will focus more on your use of language and presentation. Of course, there will be a suggested answer; and
[6] Other mock bar questions will soon be available here:


Violating a curfew ordinance, Patricia and Anjelina, both minors, decided to go to a nearby 8-Twelve convenience store. On their way to said store, a dog started barking at them and chasing them. It must be noted that another ordinance exists, requiting all pets dogs to be chained or kept away from public roads and streets. Here, the dog owner failed to comply with this pet ordinance.

The two girls were surprised when the dog started running toward them and, fearing that it may bite them, they crossed a street without taking precautions. Unfortunately, a car running at a speed more than required by law hit Anjelina. Both her legs had to be amputated but she survived. Patricia had a nervous breakdown but was physically unharmed. The dog was also safe.

[1] Discuss the liability of the persons involved and explain why and who should pay damages.
[2] Does the doctrine of proximate cause apply here? Why or why not?

Popular Posts