Normal Equanimity Rule; Passion, Obfuscation
To be entitled to this mitigating circumstance, the following elements must be present: (1) There should be an act both unlawful and sufficient to produce such condition of mind; (2) the act that produced the obfuscation was not far removed from the commission of the crime by a considerable length of time, during which the perpetrator might recover his normal equanimity. (People vs. Gonzalez, G.R. No. 139542, 21 June 2001, 359 SCRA 220)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg2Suu3GpRFBJMNt_Xd9HdXLQrCGcFyyK2ABf8Wqp9jDMEhsElANUMFNtydUR705PiDCRki0qBKBbzaGV8meDy_1W8StxjHxxPk7rtiX-9GPtzubSpv691ASEb6VHgA_S3TkTnl7ZDtUg/s200/criminal+penal+law+projectjurisprudence.png)