PROJECT JURISPRUDENCE

377 Phil. 257 SECOND DIVISION [ G.R. No. 127347. November 25, 1999 ] ALFREDO N. AGUILA, JR, PETITIONER, VS. HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS AND FELICIDAD S. VDA. DE ABROGAR, RESPONDENTS. D E C I S I O N MENDOZA, J.: This is a petition for review on  certiorari  of the decision[1] of the Court of Appeals, dated November 29, 1990, which reversed the decision of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 273, Marikina, Metro Manila, dated April 11, 1995. The trial court dismissed the petition for declaration of nullity of a deed of sale filed by private respondent Felicidad S. Vda. de Abrogar against petitioner Alfredo N. Aguila, Jr. The facts are as follows: Petitioner is the manager of A.C. Aguila & Sons, Co., a partnership engaged in lending activities. Private respondent and her late husband, Ruben M. Abrogar, were the registered owners of a house and lot, covered by Transfer Certificate of Title No. 195101, in Marikina, Metro Manila. On April 18, 1991, private respondent, with the consent

116 Phil. 112  [ G.R. No. L-18107. August 30, 1962 ] MARIA G. AGUAS, FELIX GUARDINO AND FRANCISCO SALINAS, PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS, VS. HERMOGENES LLEMOS, DECEASED DEFENDANT SUBSTITUTED BY HIS REPRESENTATIVES, PERPETUA YERRO-LLEMOS, HERMENEGILDO LLEMOS, FELINO LLEMOS AND AMADO LLEMOS, DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES. D E C I S I O N REYES, J.B.L., J.: On 14 March 1960, Francisco Salinas and the spouses Felix Guardino and Maria Aguas jointly filed an action in the Court of First Instance of Catbalogan, Samar (Civil Case No. 4824), to recover damages from Hermogenes Llemos, averring that the latter served them by registered mail with a copy of a petition for a writ of possession, with notice that the same would be submitted to the said court of Samar on February 23, 1960 at 8:00 a. m.; that in view of the copy and notice served, plaintiffs proceeded to the court from their residence in Manila accompanied by their lawyers, only to discover that no such petition had been filed; and that d

401 Phil. 644 SECOND DIVISION [ G.R. No. 117660. December 18, 2000 ] AGRO CONGLOMERATES, INC. AND MARIO SORIANO, PETITIONERS, VS. THE HON. COURT OF APPEALS AND REGENT SAVINGS AND LOAN BANK, INC., RESPONDENTS. D E C I S I O N QUISUMBING, J.: This is a petition for review challenging the decision[1] dated October 17, 1994 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. No. 32933, which affirmed  in toto  the judgment of the Manila Regional Trial Court, Branch 27, in consolidated Cases Nos. 86-37374, 86-37388, 86-37543. This petition springs from three complaints for sums of money filed by respondent bank against herein petitioners. In the decision of the Court of Appeals, petitioners were ordered to pay respondent bank, as follows: Wherefore, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of plaintiff and against defendants, as follows: 1) In Civil Case No. 86-37374 , defendants [petitioners, herein] are ordered jointly and severally, to pay to plaintiff the amount of P78,212.29, together with inte

116 Phil. 839 [ G. R. No. L-17898. October 31, 1962 ] PASTOR D. AGO, PETITIONER, VS. THE HON. COURT OP APPEALS, HON. MONTANO A. ORTIZ, JUDGE OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF AGUSAN, THE PROVINCIAL SHERIFF OF SURIGAO AND GRACE PARK ENGINEERING, INC., RESPONDENTS. D E C I S I O N LABRADOR, J.: Appeal by certiorari to review the decision of respondent Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. No. 26723-R entitled "Pastor D. Ago.  vs.  The Provincial Sheriff of Surigao, et al." which in part reads: "In this case for certiorari and prohibition with preliminary injunction, it appears from the records that the respondent Judge of the Court of First Instance of Agusan rendered judgment (Annex 'A') in open court on January 28, 1959, basing said judgment on a compromise agreement between the parties. "On August 15, 1959, upon petition, the Court of First Instance issued a writ of execution. "Petitioner's motion for reconsideration dated October 12, 1959 alleges t

471 Phil. 582 FIRST DIVISION [ G.R. No. 154618. April 14, 2004 ] AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES SINGAPORE (PTE) LTD., PETITIONER, VS. INTEGRATED SILICON TECHNOLOGY PHILIPPINES CORPORATION, TEOH KIANG HONG, TEOH KIANG SENG, ANTHONY CHOO, JOANNE KATE M. DELA CRUZ, JEAN KAY M. DELA CRUZ AND ROLANDO T. NACILLA, RESPONDENTS. D E C I S I O N YNARES-SATIAGO, J.: This petition for review assails the Decision dated August 12, 2002 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 66574, which dismissed Civil Case No. 3123-2001-C and annulled and set aside the Order dated September 4, 2001 issued by the Regional Trial Court of Calamba, Laguna, Branch 92. Petitioner Agilent Technologies Singapore (Pte.), Ltd. (“Agilent”) is a foreign corporation, which, by its own admission, is not licensed to do business in the Philippines.[1] Respondent Integrated Silicon Technology Philippines Corporation (“Integrated Silicon”) is a private domestic corporation, 100% foreign owned, which is engaged in the business of manu

689 Phil. 11 SECOND DIVISION [ G.R. No. 183623. June 25, 2012 ] LETICIA B. AGBAYANI, PETITIONER, VS. COURT OF APPEALS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND LOIDA MARCELINA J. GENABE, RESPONDENTS. D E C I S I O N REYES, J.: On petition for review under Rule 45 of the 1997 Rules of Court is the Decision[1] dated March 27, 2008 of the Court of Appeals (CA) dismissing the petition for  certiorari  and the Resolution[2] dated July 3, 2008 denying the motion for reconsideration thereof in CA-G.R. SP No. 99626. Petitioner Leticia B. Agbayani (Agbayani) assails the resolution of the Department of Justice (DOJ) which directed the withdrawal of her complaint for grave oral defamation filed against respondent Loida Marcelina J. Genabe (Genabe). Antecedent Facts Agbayani and Genabe were both employees of the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Branch 275 of Las Piñas City, working as Court Stenographer and Legal Researcher II, respectively. On December 29, 2006, Agbayani filed a criminal complaint for grave oral