Author predicted nearly 100% of Bar exam


All principles and provisions except the two witness rule needed to answer the 2018 Criminal Law Bar Exam can be found in Criminal Law Reviewers of Judge Marlo Campanilla, a celebrity author, lecturer and expert.
  1. Bar Question I (a) - Intod vs. CA GR. No. 103119 Oct. 21, 1992 (Criminal Law Review p. 48 Vol. I);
  2. Bar Question I (b) - People vs. Cruz GR. No. 168446 Sept. 18, 2009; People vs. Salvador GR. No. 201443 April 10, 2013; Conspiracy vs. Accomplice (Criminal Law Review Vol. II);
  3. Bar Question II (a)- People vs. Mangulabnan L-8919 Sept. 28, 1956 accidental killing robbery; aberratio ictus; (Criminal Law Review p. 94 Vol. II and p. 35. Volume 1);
  4. Bar Question II(b)-People vs. Dela Cruz GR. No. 168173 Dec. 24, 2008, People vs. Castro GR. No. 187073 March 14, 2012, Collective Responsibility Rule (Criminal Law Reviewer, p. 76 Vol. II);
  5. Bar Question III (a)-People vs. Bayabos GR. No. 171222 Feb. 18, 2015 (Criminal Law Review p. 252 Vol. II);
  6. Bar Question III (b)-People vs. Dungo GR. No. 209464 July 1, 2015 (Criminal Law Review p. 253 Vol. II);
  7. Bar Question IV(a)-Property belongs to another (Criminal Law Review p. 330 Vol. II);
  8. Bar Question IV(b)- People vs. Gavida GR. No. 163927 Jan. 27, 2006, Mistake of Fact negates specific element (Criminal Law Review p. 27 Vol. I);
  9. Bar Question V(a)-Principal by direct participation/inducement, abduction and rape (Criminal Law Review p. 123-125 Vol. I);
  10. Bar Question V(b)-Sexual Abuse under RA 7610 (Criminal Law Review p. 512 Vol. II);
  11. Bar Question VI -Occupation of Real Property (Criminal Law Review p. 379-380 Vol. II);
  12. Bar Question VII(a)- Quasi Recidivism (Criminal Law Review p. 81 Vol. I);
  13. Bar Question VII(b)-People vs. Takbobo GR. No. 102984 (Criminal Law Review p. 298 Vol. II);
  14. Bar Question VIII- 3 mitigating circumstances and 1 aggravating (Criminal Law Review p. 302-305 Vol. I) Reclusion Temporal/Islaw (1995 Bar Exam);
  15. Bar Question IX(a)-1983 and 1987 Bar Exam (Criminal Law Review p. 418 Vol. II);
  16. Bar Question IX(b)-Nagrampa vs. People GR. No. 146211 Aug. 6, 2002; Wong vs. CA GR. No. 117857 Feb. 2, 2001 Criminal Law Review p. 428-429 Vol. II);
  17. Bar Question X(a)-Consent to Adultery (Criminal Law Review p. 504 Vol. II);
  18. Bar Question X(b)-People vs. Puedan GR. No. 139756 Sept. 2, 2002, requisites of death under exceptional circumstance, consent to infidelity (Criminal Law Review p. 224 Vol. I);
  19. Bar Question XI-(Criminal Law Review p. 207 Vol. I) (Criminal Law Review p. 40 Vol. II) Loose Firearms (RA 10591) Commission of other crimes (2004 and 1975 Bar Exams);
  20. Bar Question XII(a)-Absolutory cause (Criminal Law Review p. 221 Vol. I);
  21. Bar Question XII(b)-Grandson intestate Estate of Gonzales GR. No. 181409 Feb. 11, 2010;
  22. Bar Question XIII(a)-Rebellion and Treason (Criminal Law Review p. 26-27 Vol. II) Peacetime and Wartime Crime p. 4;
  23. Bar Question XIII (b)-Two Witness Rule;
  24. Bar Question XIV(a)-Territoriality (Criminal Law Review p. 6 Vol. I);
  25. Bar Question XIV(b)-Non-commercial quantity, Asuncion vs. CA GR. No. 125959 Feb. 1, 1999, Sales vs. People GR. No. 191023 Feb. 6, 2013;
  26. Bar Question XIV(c)-Rehabilitation for use of dangerous drugs; penalty for importation is life imprisonment converted into reclusion perpetua; minority; reduced to reclusion temporal; Section 98 of RA No. 9165, People vs. Montalaba GR. No. 186227 July 20, 2011, People vs. Musa GR. No. 199735 Oct. 24, 2012, (Criminal Law Reviever; Volume 1, page 211 to 212);
  27. Bar Question XIV(d)-Cybercrime, illegal access (Criminal Law Review p. 325 Vol. II);
  28. Bar Question XV-People vs. Reyes GR. No. 177105-06 Aug. 12, 2010 (Criminal Law Review p. 146 Vol. II);
  29. Bar Question XVI(a)-Dinamling vs. People GR. No. 199522 June 22, 2015 (Criminal Law Review p. 260-261 Vol. II);
  30. Bar Question XVI(b)-Economic Violence (Criminal Law Review p. 261 Vol. II);
  31. Bar Question XVII(a)-Intent to cause damage not an element in falsification of public document; Goma vs. CA (Criminal Law review p. 86-87 Vol. II);
  32. Bar Question XVII(b)-Intent to cause damage an element of falsification of private document;
  33. Bar Question XVIII(a)-Child Abuse, corporal punishment is not a defense; Rosales vs. People GR. No. 173988 Oct. 8, 2014 (Criminal Law Reviewer p. 263 Vol II);
  34. Bar Question XVIII (b)- Applying by analogy the case of People vs. Abay, G.R. No. 177752, February 24, 2009; and
  35. Bar Question XIX-Attempted Corruption of Public Officer, Pozar vs. CA L-62439 Oct. 23, 1984, People vs. Ng Pek GR. No. L-1895 Oct. 2, 1948; (Criminal Law Reviewer p. 66 Vol. I).
SOURCE: 2018 Criminal Law Bar Exam vs. Campanilla’s Reviewers (Almost 100% hit). MARLO CAMPANILLA. TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2018. https://www.facebook.com/notes/marlo-campanilla/2018-criminal-law-bar-exam-vs-campanillas-reviewers-almost-100-hit/2313927115293512.

YOU MAY ALSO BE INTERESTED IN THE FOLLOWING:

[1] Campanilla explains "arson with homicide" - Project Jurisprudence.
[2] Campanilla summarizes Chiong sisters case in 136 words.
[3] Campanilla disagrees with SC on acts of lasciviousness.
[4] Campanilla: We should revert to the old rule - Project Jurisprudence.
[5] Campanilla: Congress should amend child abuse law.
[6] Law expert: "Child abuse is malum in se".
[7] Law expert: Cyber libel, NOT a crime.
[8] Campanilla explains crimes committed in EEZ - Project Jurisprudence.

Popular Posts